LEARN Logs
Storage strength (how deeply wired in) and retrieval strength (how accessible right now) — they vary independently.
Robert Bjork's "New Theory of Disuse" (1992) proposes that any given memory carries two separate values:
Property
Storage strength
Retrieval strength
Meaning...
Q You re-read your notes and everything feels obvious. Is that good evidence you've learned it?
No — that fluency mostly reflects high retrieval strength in the moment, which is a weak and often misleading sign of durable learning.
Re-reading keeps the material continuously in front of you, so retrieval strength stays pinned high and everything reads as "known." But recogni...
Q When does a review add the MOST storage strength?
When you've partly forgotten it: a successful, effortful retrieval at LOW retrieval strength produces the largest gain in storage strength.
This is the counter-intuitive core of Bjork's framework. If you review something you already recall fluently (high retrieval strength), you...
Q What is the meta-point — how does this app apply spaced repetition and the testing effect?
This very app schedules your cards with exactly this FSRS logic — showing each card right as you're about to forget it.
Every flashcard and duel you answer feeds a per-card memory estimate; the scheduler then surfaces each item near the moment its recall probability dips toward t...
Q What does the "jump up" around 24 hours in Murre and Dros's data suggest?
Retention dipped and then partly recovered around the one-day mark, consistent with sleep consolidating memories overnight.
When Murre and Dros (2015) replicated Ebbinghaus, their curve wasn't perfectly smooth — retention was a little higher around 24 hours than the pure-decay tr...
Q Why does a spaced-repetition flashcard app work — in terms of the spacing effect and the testing (re...
It interrupts the forgetting curve just before you'd forget (spacing) and forces you to recall rather than recognize (effortful retrieval) — the two strongest results in memory science.
This is the payoff of the whole mission — and it's why this very app works. A well-designed sp...
Q Why does re-reading feel more effective than self-testing, even though it isn't?
Because re-reading produces fluency — the material looks familiar — which we mistake for actual knowledge (the illusion of competence).
When you re-read, the words flow smoothly and everything feels known. Your brain reads that fluency as "I've got this." But familiarity with see...
Q What are SM-2's interval rules?
The first two intervals are fixed, then each interval is the previous one times the ease factor.
$$I_1 = 1 \text{ day}, \quad I_2 = 6 \text{ days}, \quad I_n = I_{n-1} \times EF \ (n \ge 3)$$
So with a typical starting ease of $EF = 2.5$: 1 day → 6 days → 15 days → ~37 days → ~94...
Q Did retrieval practice beat elaborative concept-mapping (a mind-map-style technique) in a head-to-he...
Yes — Karpicke & Blunt (2011) found retrieval practice outperformed making elaborate concept maps.
Karpicke & Blunt (2011) pitted retrieval practice against elaborative concept-mapping — drawing rich diagrams of how ideas connect, which intuitively feels like "deep" processing.
R...
Q What can no scheduling algorithm fix?
Badly written cards, cramming, and skipped days — and it can't turn memorisation into understanding.
Card quality: spaced repetition needs atomic, well-formed items — one concept per card. No algorithm rescues a card asking you to recall five facts at once.
Discipline: cramming...