LOGBOOK

HELP

Quiz Entry - updated: 2026.11.05

What are the three ways the police use DNA traces in investigations, and how do they differ?

Confirming a suspect (narrow context), searching databases for a known offender (extended context), and building a profile of an unknown offender (open context). The wider the context, the weaker the evidence and the greater the ethical risk.

Three DNA contexts, from narrow to open

* The three DNA contexts: each wider ring involves more people who are not suspected of anything *

Use Steps Strength
1. Confirm a suspect (narrow context) DNA from the crime scene is compared with DNA taken from the suspect. Very high evidential value.
2. Find a "known" offender (extended context) The crime-scene DNA is matched against DNA stored in databases, including ones collected for other purposes (zweckfremd). High value if there is a hit.
3. Find an "unknown" offender (open context) A "phantom profile" of the likely offender's traits is built from the DNA, databases are searched for relatives, and a public dragnet search is run with the virtual profile. Only probabilistic; many innocent people come under suspicion.

The ethical problems grow from step to step. Step 1 concerns only the suspect, while steps 2 and 3 pull in people who are not suspected of anything: those whose DNA was stored for another reason, their relatives, and everyone who happens to share the predicted traits.

Go deeper:

From Quiz: ETHIK / Police Ethics: Legitimacy, Investigative Technology and Cop Culture | Updated: Nov 05, 2026